THC Group

View Original

Crown and Constitution: Trump's Executive Power Grab Shakes America's Foundations

Shawn Collins
See this content in the original post

In today's digital age, revolutions are televised, tweeted, and occasionally crowned with a glittering Photoshop filter. This week, the White House's official Instagram account posted an image that would've made King Charles blush: Donald Trump, resplendent in a golden crown, looming over Manhattan. The caption? "LONG LIVE THE KING!" This declaration came after his administration killed New York's congestion pricing program, sparing commuters $9-a-day tolls. Trump declared himself king over traffic, but in the breakneck pace of his presidency, this blog may be rendered obsolete by tonight's tweet or tomorrow's executive order. The digital crown of today could be replaced by a new royal decree before the ink on this analysis dries, leaving us in a perpetual state of catching up to the latest act in Trump's political theater.

This was not a meme.  This was not satire.  This was the latest act in a presidency that has fused bureaucratic power plays with the aesthetic bravado of a reality TV showman.  Since retaking office in January, Trump has signed over 60 executive orders while Congress has perfected the art of performative inaction, mastering the delicate balance between furrowed brows and idle hands.  The "king" gambit, far from a fleeting outburst, lays bare the fundamental question haunting our democracy: Can the American experiment endure when its supposed steward behaves like a monarch-in-waiting, treating the Constitution as more suggestion than sacred text?

The First Month: Executive Orders as Performance Art

Trump's opening gambit was less "First 100 Days" and more "First 100 Decrees." In a whirlwind of executive actions, he:

  • Executive Order 14067: Declared an “invasion” at the southern border, deploying troops for immigration enforcement (a likely violation of the Posse Comitatus Act).

  • Executive Order 14068: Attempted to revoke birthright citizenship via fiat, colliding with the 14th Amendment’s “subject to the jurisdiction” clause.

  • Executive Order 14069: Gutted federal diversity programs under orders like “Ending Radical DEI Initiatives”.

  • Executive Order 14070: Centralized legal interpretation under the Oval Office, neutering independent agencies.

The speed served dual purposes: overwhelm legal challenges (courts can’t block 60 orders at once) and signal cultural war victories to his base.  President Trump isn’t so much as governing as he is branding these days.

Trump’s most impressive feat, though?  Transforming bureaucratic minutiae into viral spectacle.  Revoking a toll program becomes “SAVING NEW YORK”; slashing climate research funding morphs into “PURGING WOKE SCIENCE.”  Each executive action reads less like coherent policy and more like a scene from a political reality show, where our protagonist-in-chief wages war against an ever-expanding rogues' gallery of supposed villains, from bike-lane advocates to climate scientists, or anyone who owns a reusable straw.

Checks and Balances Under Strain

The checks and balances imbedded in our Constitution by the nation’s Founding Fathers are creaking, but remain intact:

  • Courts: Blocked Trump’s birthright citizenship order, citing the 14th Amendment’s “plain language”.

  • States: New York sued over the congestion pricing reversal, invoking federalism.

  • Bureaucrats: Career staffers slow walk orders, reviving “resistance” tactics from Trump’s first term.

Yet partisanship warps institutional responses. Congressional Republicans, who impeached Clinton over a lie and fretted over Obama’s “imperial presidency,” now shrug as Trump claims both divine and regal authority.  A Pew Research poll found 59% of Republicans support expanding Trump’s power, versus 90% of Democrats who call it “too risky”.

Put simply: The system of checks and balances loses its potency when those meant to provide oversight are instead auditioning for roles as presidential cheerleaders.

History's Ghosts: Executive Overreach from Lincoln to Nixon

Trump's monarchical posturing, while jarring, isn't without historical precedent.  Past presidents have tested the boundaries of executive power, most often during times of national crisis.  However, Trump's approach stands out for its theatrical flair and unapologetic embrace of authoritarian aesthetics.

Lincoln's Wartime Gambit

During the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln took the extraordinary step of suspending habeas corpus, a fundamental constitutional protection against unlawful detention.  Lincoln justified this action as necessary to preserve the Union in the face of an existential threat.  On April 27, 1861, he authorized military commanders to suspend the writ between Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., allowing for the arrest and detention of suspected secessionists without judicial review.

Lincoln's decision was highly controversial and faced legal challenges.  In the case of Ex parte Merryman, Chief Justice Roger Taney ruled that only Congress had the authority to suspend habeas corpus.  Lincoln, however, disregarded this ruling, arguing that his duty to preserve the nation superseded strict adherence to legal norms. Congress eventually validated Lincoln's actions by passing the Habeas Corpus Act of 1863, providing legislative backing for the suspension.

FDR's Wartime Internment

In the wake of the Pearl Harbor attack, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942, leading to the forced relocation and internment of approximately 120,000 Japanese Americans.  This action, driven by a combination of wartime hysteria and racial prejudice, resulted in the loss of property, livelihoods, and dignity for many American citizens of Japanese descent.

The internment camps operated by the military confined more than two-thirds of those interned who were native-born American citizens.  Despite this grave injustice, thousands of young Japanese American men volunteered to serve in the U.S. military, forming the highly decorated 442nd Regimental Combat Team.

In the decades following World War II, the internment has been widely recognized as a dark chapter in American history.  The Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, established in 1980, concluded that the internment was not justified by military necessity and was instead fueled by "race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership".

Nixon's Imperial Presidency

President Richard Nixon pushed the boundaries of executive power to new limits, famously declaring in an interview with David Frost, "When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal".  This statement came in the context of discussing the Huston Plan, which proposed using illegal methods such as burglary to gather intelligence on domestic groups.

Nixon argued that actions taken by the president in the interest of national security or domestic tranquility, even if technically illegal, would not subject those carrying them out to criminal prosecution.  This expansive view of executive authority ultimately contributed to Nixon's downfall in the Watergate scandal.

Trump's Theatrical Authoritarianism

While past presidents expanded executive power incrementally and often discreetly, Trump's approach is marked by its brazen showmanship.  His political style blends elements of reality TV bravado with authoritarian posturing, creating a spectacle that both entertains and alarms.

Trump has transformed social media into a virtual platform for governance, issuing decrees and attacking opponents with unprecedented immediacy. Unlike past presidents who relied on formal addresses and carefully staged press conferences, Trump turns every tweet into a proclamation. This digital-age pageantry projects an image of authority and keeps the public's attention fixed on a smartphone screen rather than traditional channels of communication.

Trump's political style, marked by exaggerated gestures and facial expressions, deviates sharply from the restrained comportment typically expected of presidents. His performances often resemble stand-up comedy routines, using humor and mockery to critique opponents and the political system.

While this theatrical approach has proven effective in capturing media attention and energizing supporters, it raises serious concerns about the erosion of democratic norms. The risk lies in normalizing executive overreach through entertainment value.

As we navigate this era of performative politics, history serves as both warning and guide. The challenge is to preserve essential democratic checks and balances while recognizing the power of political theater in shaping public opinion and policy.

The Road Ahead: Democracy's Stress Test

As Trump's executive actions continue to reshape the landscape of American governance, the nation faces an unprecedented stress test of its democratic institutions.  The challenges ahead are multifaceted and far-reaching, extending beyond the immediate impact of his orders to the very foundations of constitutional democracy.

Legal Challenges: The Judicial Gauntlet

Trump's boldest executive orders face a barrage of legal challenges, with over 60 lawsuits filed in the first month of his term alone.  These legal battles will likely shape the extent of executive power for years to come:

  • Constitutional Showdowns: The birthright citizenship order, which directly contradicts the 14th Amendment, has already been temporarily blocked nationwide.  This case could reignite debates over nationwide injunctions and test the limits of executive authority.

  • Administrative Procedure Act (APA) Violations: Many lawsuits allege violations of the APA, challenging the procedural legitimacy of Trump's orders.  The outcome of these cases could redefine the boundaries of executive rulemaking.

  • Selective Judicial Scrutiny: While courts may strike down the most egregious overreaches, subtler power grabs might survive judicial review.  This selective pruning could leave a patchwork of expanded executive authority intact.

Whiplash Governance: The Erosion of Trust

The rapid-fire issuance and reversal of executive orders have plunged the nation into a state of policy whiplash. In New York, the sudden repeal of the congestion pricing program sent shockwaves through the city's transit system. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority now grapples with a staggering $15 billion funding gap, throwing long-term infrastructure plans into disarray. Meanwhile, the health care sector finds itself in limbo as Trump's regulatory freeze brings progress on critical issues to a grinding halt. Pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers are left guessing about future pricing structures and oversight requirements.

As policies fluctuate with dizzying speed, the American public watches from the sidelines, their faith in government efficacy eroding with each abrupt shift. The constant legal battles and policy reversals are breeding a dangerous cynicism. Citizens, overwhelmed by the chaos, may begin to disengage from the democratic process altogether, viewing their participation as futile in the face of such unpredictability1.

This environment of instability threatens not just immediate policy outcomes, but the very foundations of democratic engagement and long-term governance

Norm Entropy: The Slippery Slope

As Trump's presidency unfolds, each breach of established norms sends ripples through the fabric of American governance, making future transgressions not only more likely but increasingly palatable to a weary public. The White House's audacious move to bring independent agencies under its direct control has sent shockwaves through Washington. Career bureaucrats, once shielded by institutional independence, now find themselves looking over their shoulders, wondering if their decisions will align with the president's whims. This power grab, if left unchecked, threatens to reshape the executive branch into a monolithic entity, with diverse agencies reduced to mere extensions of the Oval Office.

Meanwhile, the specter of Schedule F looms large over the federal workforce. As the administration pushes to reclassify swaths of government employees as at-will workers, the professional civil service teeters on the brink of collapse. In its place, a system of political patronage threatens to emerge, where loyalty trumps expertise and the spoils of electoral victory extend deep into the machinery of government.

Perhaps most alarming is the president's liberal use of emergency declarations to sidestep congressional oversight. What was once a tool reserved for genuine crises has become a convenient shortcut for implementing controversial policies. As these declarations pile up, future administrations may find themselves tempted to follow suit, gradually eroding the checks and balances that have long safeguarded American democracy.

The Genie Unleashed: Imagining Future Scenarios

The precedents set by Trump's actions could be exploited by future presidents across the political spectrum:

  • Progressive Overreach: A progressive president might declare a "national health emergency" to implement a universal single-payer health care system without congressional approval.  This could involve using executive authority to expand Medicare to cover all Americans, override state insurance regulations, and redirect funds from other agencies to rapidly build out a national health insurance infrastructure.  Such a move would align with growing calls from health care reform advocates to treat the lack of affordable, comprehensive health care as a national crisis requiring immediate federal intervention.

  • Libertarian Dismantling: A libertarian-minded president might declare a "regulatory emergency" to unilaterally dismantle large swaths of the administrative state.  This could involve using executive authority to suspend enforcement of regulations across multiple agencies, drastically reduce staffing at regulatory bodies like the EPA and OSHA, and implement a sweeping deregulation agenda without congressional approval.  Such a move would align with libertarian calls to dramatically reduce the size and scope of the federal government's regulatory apparatus, which they view as overly burdensome on businesses and individual liberties.

As Trump's latest executive spectacle unfolds, America stands at a crossroads. Our democracy, once a beacon of stability, now faces unprecedented challenges. The system of checks and balances strains under the weight of expanding executive power.

Yet, our nation has weathered similar storms before. From Lincoln to FDR, we've bent without breaking. Now, as social media blurs the lines of presidential authority, we must reaffirm our commitment to the principles that have long sustained us.

Benjamin Franklin's words resonate anew: "A republic, if you can keep it." This task now falls to us, demanding active participation. Every tweet and executive order presents an opportunity to shape our democracy's future.

The true strength of our nation lies not in the Oval Office, but in the collective will of its people. As we navigate these uncharted waters, remember: the power to preserve our Republic resides in every American.

In this pivotal chapter of American democracy, we all hold the pen. What legacy will we choose to inscribe?

Sources, Resources, and Suggested Reading:

News Articles

Legal Analysis

Academic Resources

Advocacy Organizations

Legal Challenges

See this content in the original post